Talk:Fetal Position (House)

Television: Episode coverage / House Mid‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This redirect is supported by the House task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Much better format than previous episodes. All the articles in this series should have minimal "sections," as there should only be one or two notes sections, not one each for "arc advancement" and "referbacks" (what is that anyways). Mooshimanx 17:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Referbacks are references to previous episodes. The actual format of multiple sections isn't uncommon --206.75.46.254 18:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above comment was made by me: --Forgottenlord 18:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These episode guides are becoming longer to read than watching the show, is it really necessary to include every little thing that happened?

It is probably worth noting that the scene with the fetus grabbing House's finger, while based on an actual event, followed a mere month after Scrubs treated the same scene in the episode "My Road to Nowhere."

In the actual event "The baby was anesthetized. The baby was not aware of what was going on.". That was Dr. Burner's statement who was the surgeon of the operation. Later he said that he moved the baby's hand, not the baby grabbed his hand. I don't know if the fetus was anesthetized in this scene, if yes, it's movement should be noted as an unrealistic portrayal or whatever the lingo expression is for this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kangaxx (talk • contribs) 23:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the quotes section and added to the Wikiquote article as per WP:NOT#DIRECTORY. GeorgeC 15:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having watched the final scene I cannot find any reference to the baby being named Greg, either on screen or in the dialogue, can anyone confirm the source of this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redback (talk • contribs) 09:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just rewatched the ending but could not find any indication that the baby was named Greg. BlueJaeger (talk) 22:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same here. I removed the reference. --Brokshen (talk) 14:30, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fetal Position (House). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120603011341/http://www.fox.com/house/ to http://www.fox.com/house/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]